Lenovo 20JVS0YA00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20JVS0YA00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JVS0YA00
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171110
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 10:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 128
57% 93 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 182
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 505F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 6
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 123P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 309 241 108 63 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 709
Write 537
Mixed 516
SusWrite 187
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 22.7
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 136
108% 152 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
931GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 168
Write 29.1
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 31.4
48% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 22% 40 59 2 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A0
Typical 20JVS0YA00 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20JVS0YA00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback