HP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8950
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 08:18
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 198
2-Core 390
115% 222 Pts
4-Core 767
8-Core 1,335
127% 1,051 Pts
64-Core 2,180
135% 2,180 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
HP(103C 8904) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.87
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 120
Parallax 123
108% 125 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.9
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2555 1974 1978 2013 2040 2005 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2,447
Write 2,968
Mixed 2,494
SusWrite 2,094
565% 2,501 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 99.4
326% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1,827
DQ Mixed 1580
1,211% 1,626 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 401%
Great: 431%
WDC WD20EZBX-60AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 218 224 219 221 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 247
Write 215
Mixed 111
SusWrite 220
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.3
48% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 1.9
3% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.7% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 219 60 60 24.1" 1920 1137 HPN368F HP E24i G4
Typical Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback