Colorful A320M-K PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemColorful A320M-K PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful A320M-K PRO
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220425
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 01:51
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 226
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 579
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 71.3
42% 60.6 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 43.7
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed K7-256G-CD 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A2P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 137 11 124 63 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 478
Write 404
Mixed 383
SusWrite 92.5
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 29.6
131% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 59.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
34% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1816RGB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 21 60 27.6" 1280 720 SAM0E90 SAMSUNG
Typical A320M-K PRO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Colorful A320M-K PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback