Positivo A14CR6A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemPositivo A14CR6A  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A14CR6A
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 23:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 85.2
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 106
55% 85 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 160
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 20 35 16 47 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 196
Write 274
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 48.9
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT351S6EFR8A-PBHS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 56 60 14" 1366 705 CMN1470
Typical A14CR6A Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A14CR6A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback