Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 22:45
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 301
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 954
93% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,409
87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
CLim: 2257 MHz, MLim: 3788 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 128
Parallax 130
113% 132 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 110
Splatting 96.4
93% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2914 1856 1851 1872 1883 1899 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 2,911
Write 2,857
Mixed 3,053
SusWrite 2,046
612% 2,717 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 109
355% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 1001
DQ Mixed 1,117
839% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 402%
Great: 477%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30023 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4042 4375 4368 3806 1202 1531 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2541
Write 3,936
Mixed 3,076
SusWrite 3,221
725% 3,193 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 109
349% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1404
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 1,316
969% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 464%
Great: 602%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$146
44GB free
Firmware: 620331WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,229
Write 4,373
Mixed 3,328
888% 3,977 MB/s
4K Read 74.8
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 91.8
332% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1511
DQ Write 1,238
DQ Mixed 1,364
1,024% 1,371 MB/s
Poor: 293% Great: 666%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
321GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 154 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 174
Mixed 84
SusWrite 152
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC29B 27M1C5500V
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback