Lenovo 82K2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82K2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230901
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 18:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 291
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 795
85% 676 Pts
64-Core 949
59% 949 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.56
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.8% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 49.6
44% 52.1 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 42.6
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Rogueware M.2 PCIe NX300M 1TB
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H221130a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1664 2059 2093 2204 1989 1231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 2,282
Mixed 1912
SusWrite 1,873
479% 2130 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 59.6
196% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 733
548% 735 MB/s
Poor: 329%
This bench: 306%
Great: 476%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 16GB
3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9059
Typical 82K2 Builds (Compare 4,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82K2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback