Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2295 188 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 69 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 743 69% 573 Pts	64-Core 2239 139% 2239 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 94%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 294% 901GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS3NGXH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,795 Write 1,741 Mixed 1,657 387% 1,731 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 72.2 243% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 895 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 823 613% 815 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 431%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 16GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 106 Write 20.4 Mixed 28.7 50% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.7 231% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40DB2-CVF 4x16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 49.2 MC Mixed 30.6 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 9.4 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	23	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	370x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	350x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	329x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	273x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	89x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16