Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 343%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 383%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics295% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive549% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 12:22
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14600KF-$256
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 221
2-Core 442
126% 247 Pts
4-Core 883
8-Core 1,531
146% 1,207 Pts
64-Core 2,542
157% 2,542 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Gigabyte(1458 40BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Lighting 440
Reflection 433
Parallax 460
359% 444 fps
MRender 561
Gravity 370
Splatting 267
311% 399 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 295%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3811 4011 4052 4344 3285 1458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
549% Outstanding
Read 3,998
Write 4239
Mixed 2834
SusWrite 3,494
820% 3,641 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 104
349% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,716
DQ Write 1,324
DQ Mixed 1,514
1,134% 1,518 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 549%
Great: 564%
VendorCo Disk 3.0 67GB
32GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.4
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.2
10% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 16%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
32GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 216
Write 49.2
Mixed 12
80% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6800J3445G161x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 29.8
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BEE LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback