Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '23 at 12:22
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 71 1-Core 108 2-Core 194 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 370 47% 357 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.24 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.2 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 19.1 12% 15.1 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 15 Splatting 12.5 10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 423 Mixed 27.9 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 10 65% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 50 103% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 763GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 170 163 163 158 157 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 160 Mixed 39 SusWrite 158 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 290GB free, PID a100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 83 81 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 93 Write 90 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 81.7 98% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 1x8GB 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 16 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	24.1"	1280 720	FUS0811 B24W-6 LED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	237x
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	159x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	153x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	374x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	98x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	76x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	97x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	93x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	81x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	112x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 51,435 samples	97x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $641

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16