Asus PRIME A620M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A620M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$197
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 215
2-Core 421
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1,156
122% 978 Pts
64-Core 1391
86% 1391 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 285
Parallax 306
238% 295 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 253
Splatting 191
207% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 58 56 46 26 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 466
Write 102
Mixed 175
SusWrite 55.4
43% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 26.3
102% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 74.6
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 49.6
48% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
219GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2205 631 123 122 115 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
785GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 156 161 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 105
Mixed 104
SusWrite 157
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 43.8
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 48.3
SC Write 55.7
SC Mixed 50.6
147% 51.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 129%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 240 23.8" 1280 720 AOCB203 24G2W1G8
Typical PRIME A620M-A Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A620M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback