HP 700-229c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-229c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 520
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 32
Parallax 37.4
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 38
Splatting 31.5
29% 36.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Exram 128GB 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 393 390 426 268 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 426
Write 394
Mixed 346
SusWrite 297
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 12.4
96% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 56.2
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 15.6
52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 158%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2888 HP 2010
Typical 700-229c Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-229c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback