Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 164
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 477
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 109
Parallax 122
101% 119 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 122
Splatting 101
103% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 125
Mixed 233
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 28.5
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 139
133% 212 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
136GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 373
Mixed 344
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 36.5
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 248
206% 298 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Micron CT1000X 1TB
876GB free
Firmware: PMAP
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 26.8
Write 28.2
Mixed 27.5
6% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.6
22% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 32.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 240 27" 1280 720 SAM727D Odyssey G40B
Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback