Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 202 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 563 55% 451 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.9% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 86.1 Parallax 50.7 45% 64 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 51 Splatting 49.1 39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 983 995 1035 967 410 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,044 Write 1,001 Mixed 978 SusWrite 900 221% 981 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 45.6 150% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 719 DQ Mixed 636 469% 606 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 181%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston KVR24S17S8/8 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3200, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 26.9 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	6	60	23.8"	1920 1017	DELA16D DELL S2421HGF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	211x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	267x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16