Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER G770 001
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 98
2-Core 197
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 112
28% 182 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Quanta(152D 1234) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 37
Parallax 36.9
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.7
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 1249 1245 1044 1189 1130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 649
Mixed 919
SusWrite 1,155
218% 970 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 14.8
44% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 131%
Great: 352%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113
779GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 433 429 387 420 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 382
Mixed 371
SusWrite 421
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 332
247% 326 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 1.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 54.6" 1280 720 SAM7109 SAMSUNG
Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $45
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback