Medion P6681 MD60677

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion P6681 MD60677  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KR
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170410
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 10:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 155
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 212
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 2318) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 30.6
25% 30 fps
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 19.6
18% 20.9 fps
Poor: 18% Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 362 303 405 411 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 402
Write 363
Mixed 350
SusWrite 352
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33.1
93% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 292
232% 324 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 123%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
175GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 77 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43% Average
Read 72.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 77.4
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0590
Typical P6681 MD60677 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6681 MD60677

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback