Viglen VIG800S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemViglen VIG800S  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 08:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 370
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 53.9
46% 56.8 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 47.4
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.18.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 390 392 276 255 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 466
Write 396
Mixed 341
SusWrite 325
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 22.3
117% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 30.8
72% 147 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 91%
Netac 512GB 512GB
266GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 387 400 406 415 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 487
Write 422
Mixed 341
SusWrite 373
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 11.1
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 14.4
69% 153 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 95%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 106 105 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 97.5
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 104
124% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-675.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720 BNQB902 BenQ PJ
Typical VIG800S Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Viglen VIG800S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback