QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 63.1
22% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 84.5
12% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 95.1
6% 95.1 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 97GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 34 29 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 58.7
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 30.4
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.7
306% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28%
Great: 101%
Qemu HARDDISK 97GB
89GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 35 28 36 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 45.8
Write 37.1
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 30.3
31% 41 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.4
298% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 730
6% 730 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 7 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback