Asrock Z170M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '18 at 18:38
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$64
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 512
67% 503 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6386) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2792 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 83.2
Reflection 156
Parallax 148
68% 129 fps
Gravity 134
Splatting 112
108% 123 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
St750lm022 HN-M750MBB 500GB
397GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 496
Mixed 508
113% 507 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 50.1
188% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 47.2
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 119
105% 149 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 405
Mixed 413
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 27.8
145% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 45.9
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 27.7
34% 59 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
163GB free
Firmware: MX6OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 146
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89%
Great: 107%
Generic- MicroSD/M2 8GB
7GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 4.42
Mixed 6.36
10% 9.49 MB/s
4K Read 2.73
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.09
13% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback