Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 197
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 564
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR256GTLCG-EAC-4 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,210
Write 1,112
Mixed 1,097
254% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 49
153% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 356
368% 603 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 202%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
795GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1928 2065 2186 2099 2178 2088 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,258
Write 1,953
Mixed 1,710
SusWrite 2,090
451% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.7
211% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1098
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 882
667% 904 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 324%
Great: 537%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6D1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 20.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 26 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical GA-AORUS 5 MB Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback