Ditecma MLP2092R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDitecma MLP2092R  (all builds)
MotherboardDITECMA MLP2092R
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 36.2
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 53.7
24% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 54.7
8% 55.7 Pts
64-Core 63
4% 63 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
N20D 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 74 60 32 62 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 198
Write 166
Mixed 176
SusWrite 63.3
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 9.4
36% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 36.9
44% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 4 60 13.3" 1296 759 NCP0020 LM133LF5L01
Typical MLP2092R Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Ditecma MLP2092R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback