Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3437U 3,817 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 29.6 2-Core 57.4 30% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 83.2 8-Core 109 12% 96 Pts	64-Core 68.2 4% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.53 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 4 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Carlstein 256GB 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1115A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 55 60 53 43 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 331 Write 305 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 99.8 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 0.5 27% 8.3 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 42.8 60% 111 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 76%
WD5000L 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 27GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 39 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Write 35 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 39.4 54% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 10.8 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 1.8 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	44	60	14"	1280 720	LGD03D2

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16