PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Atcomputers Desktop class PC (AT Computers) (all builds) |
Motherboard | Gigabyte G33M-DS2R |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090731 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 18 '23 at 13:15 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 63% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Sapphire(174B 3454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 190 201 207 217 217 MB/s
|
60%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD10JPVX-22J 1TB
94GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
|
16%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 45 | 9 | 60 | 33.1" | 1280 720 | AOC3279 Q3279WG5B |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 2x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples | 2x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $414 |