HP 650 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 650 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1858
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130219
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 09:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2348M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 33
2-Core 54.7
36% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 71.5
8-Core 74.6
10% 73.1 Pts
64-Core 77.7
5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 1858) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 199 203 207 207 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 207
Write 202
Mixed 166
SusWrite 202
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 12.2
44% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 24.9
35% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 34 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO22EC
Typical 650 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 650 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback