Lenovo 42405BG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 42405BG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42405BG
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110915
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 06:10
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 103
45% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 156
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 276 282 274 266 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 448
Mixed 377
SusWrite 283
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 40.5
133% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 278
210% 284 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 14 50 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40B1
Typical 42405BG Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42405BG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback