Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,169
104% 879 Pts
64-Core 2,270
140% 2,270 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8709) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 160
Parallax 159
137% 162 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 138
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 125%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 512 718 788 763 741 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 2,755
Mixed 1,642
SusWrite 627
374% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 63.2
220% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1,112
865% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 225%
Great: 486%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
574GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1642 1659 1409 951 934 939 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,871
Write 1847
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 1,256
348% 1,549 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.3
215% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 1,103
DQ Mixed 1,221
927% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: TA23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 172 177 173 169 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 173
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
278% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: TA23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 193 191 185 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 151
Mixed 90
SusWrite 190
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
303% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: TA23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 167 171 168 164 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 165
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 168
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.1
330% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LDAZW110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 199 200 188 188 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 214
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 196
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.1
350% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 116%
Great: 140%
Asmt ASM235CM 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 113 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 160
Write 166
Mixed 109
SusWrite 111
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
232% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 93%
Asmt ASM235CM 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 149 144 142 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 184
Mixed 121
SusWrite 145
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
274% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 111%
Asmt ASM235CM 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 115 112 111 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 172
Write 180
Mixed 115
SusWrite 112
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.2
320% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 111%
Asmt ASM235CM 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 152 158 151 149 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 116%
Asmt ASM235CM 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 147 158 154 149 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 248
Mixed 115
SusWrite 153
138% 188 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 2.4
555% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 43.3
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 39.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback