MSI MS-17S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE78HX 13VG
MotherboardMSI MS-17S2  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 02:45
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 218
2-Core 430
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 841
8-Core 1,517
142% 1,179 Pts
64-Core 3,571
221% 3,571 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13CF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4617
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 167
Parallax 184
172% 187 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 155
Splatting 111
136% 176 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 148%
Great: 152%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA2T0TFH 2TB
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2721 3225 3398 1976 1631 1655 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 3,575
Write 3,403
Mixed 2,704
SusWrite 2,434
680% 3,029 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.6
251% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,225
931% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 427%
Great: 559%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
728GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 111
Mixed 154
55% 256 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 19
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 102
89% 135 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 70.5
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 64
188% 65.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 27.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 167%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 2R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 39% 33 204 30 60 21.5" 1920 1080 DELA097 DELL P2214H
History: Score 25: 0P 2R 2G 9B | Score 32: 0P 2R 4G 10B
Typical MS-17S2 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback