Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 02:25
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 125
52% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 334
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 63.6
54% 66.2 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 63.6
54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 96 100 87 103 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 469
Write 107
Mixed 122
SusWrite 101
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 20.6
73% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 2.7
49% 121 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 129%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
24GB free
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 145 54 195 20 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 351
Write 341
Mixed 308
SusWrite 104
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 17.7
69% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 128
117% 176 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 91%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
179GB free
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 231 346 356 367 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 478
Write 382
Mixed 376
SusWrite 318
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 18.7
74% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 43.5
78% 152 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 102%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
263GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.67% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 23.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 23.1
32% 23 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.67%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 1866 CL10 Ser Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF3 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback