Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 22:24
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 84.7
50% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 144
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 108 107 108 109 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 297
Write 80.5
Mixed 282
SusWrite 116
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 21.9
69% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 92.5
99% 167 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07D0 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback