Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 7 days ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 671
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 291
Parallax 331
258% 313 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 239
Splatting 178
193% 246 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1367 1084 1071 1073 1067 1064 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,193
Write 1,864
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 1121
368% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57.1
198% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 855
645% 868 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 256%
Great: 381%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
50GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 181 31 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 453
Write 442
Mixed 393
SusWrite 125
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 37.6
126% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 369
267% 340 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 121%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 175 180 176 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 198
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 178
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
348% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
887GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 168 165 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 183
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 166
98% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
350% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 197 199 195 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 162
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 197
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 123 127 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 124
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 108%
ST950042 0AS 500GB
187GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 54.9
Write 31.3
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 36.6
47% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 36.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 29.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 34.1" 1280 720 IVM7615 PL3461WQ
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback