Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,044
95% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,910
118% 1,910 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 132
Parallax 177
72% 132 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 157
121% 148 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 RGB M.2 NVMe SSD 240GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 284 220 229 212 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 985
Write 295
Mixed 156
SusWrite 249
92% 421 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 47.9
131% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 120
115% 193 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 107%
Great: 193%
Rogueware 2.5" SATA NX100S 512GB
73GB free
Firmware: W0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 410 165 238 17 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 501
Write 409
Mixed 402
SusWrite 224
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 32
141% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 50.2
76% 143 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
48GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 119 146 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 114
Write 125
Mixed 90
SusWrite 129
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 109%
DISK 32GB
30GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.3 5.4 5.1 6.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 7.8
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.2
13% 14 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
86% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 37.9
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 35.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 116%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 MK400
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback