bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1552 x 952 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 18:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 212
61% 118 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 406
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 130D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 11 15 14 9.6 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 158
Write 22.9
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 14.7
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.9
370% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 3.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback