Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 18:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 111
46% 77 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 152
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 47
Parallax 56
35% 48.6 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 32.7
32% 40.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avant 240GB Client SSD 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 205 194 205 209 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 366
Write 219
Mixed 227
SusWrite 200
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 27.6
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 171
144% 209 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 138 140 141 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 80.1
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 139
67% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
334% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 110%
WD WD84PURZ-85B2YY0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 25 26 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 14.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 26 60 27" 1280 720 OPD0001 0E-20LED2
Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback