Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 902
90% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 125
Parallax 176
87% 136 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 122
Splatting 83.4
82% 102 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,816
Write 3188
Mixed 2,877
664% 2,961 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 96.5
315% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,115
842% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
202GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 409 411 366 348 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 386
Mixed 389
SusWrite 378
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 52.4
163% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 198
154% 213 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
137GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 47 52 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
530% Outstanding
Read 7,237
Write 52.4
Mixed 107
SusWrite 51.5
387% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 586
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 6.4
898% 198 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 530%
Great: 236%
Ocz-soli D3 120GB
104GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 96 98 96 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 152
Write 105
Mixed 128
SusWrite 97.4
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 23.9
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 79.2
73% 113 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.3% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 31.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback