Asrock B550 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 14:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 337
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1105
108% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,551
96% 1,551 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 176
Parallax 164
150% 175 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 91 100 92 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Amd-raid Array 3 119GB
641GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 77 75 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 71.5
Write 77.6
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 76.8
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.2
104% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRX3200D464L16A/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3534 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 36.7
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 34.6
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 43UHD_LCD_TV
Typical B550 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback