Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	1.65% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 139 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 308 34% 271 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 106 Parallax 0.1 81% 68.7 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 94.8 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fanxiang S101 512GB 1,873 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1021B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.3 80 79 0.6 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	1.65% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 127 Mixed 1 SusWrite 26.7 9% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 101%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 435GB free, PID ab20 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 71.5 Write 33 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 55 65% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	24.1"	1280 720	ENC3031 EV2430

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD4 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	66x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	49x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	46x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	43x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $537

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16