HP Pro 3090 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Pro 3090 Microtower PC (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR 0B58h
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20100127
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '23 at 06:22
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Memory 42.7 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 49.4 29% 44.3 Pts	4-Core 14 8-Core 73.6 4% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 76 5% 76 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.6 2% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 110 93 104 69 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 81.3 Write 96.2 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 90.3 57% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,164 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 689GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 22 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Read 17 Write 21.9 Mixed 23 SusWrite 23.3 30% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 41% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 KTW149-ELF M378B2873FH0-CH9 8GB 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 1024, 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	30	60	27"	1280 720	MSI3CB0 MSI G27CQ4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3090 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3090 Microtower PC

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	2x

GPU
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	4x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GBSamsungBench 33%, 9 samples	2x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 21%, 487 samples	1x
M378B2873FH0-CH9 4x1GBSamsungBench 36%, 182 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $22

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16