Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '23 at 22:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 159 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 393 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 8.1 5% 7.3 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.5 8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 125 54 56 58 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 1088 Write 848 Mixed 409 SusWrite 118 136% 616 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 39.6 118% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 406 DQ Mixed 216 205% 318 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 209%
WDC WD60 02FRYZ-01WD5B0 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 164 163 167 169 168 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.3% Good	Read 148 Write 156 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 166 181% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 22 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 20.8 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	51	0	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	1,007x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	811x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	359x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,107x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,070x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	772x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	338x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $58Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	217x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	568x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	307x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359