Acer Aspire E1-772G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA70_HW
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 126
50% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 202
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M
Acer(1025 0821) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 0.5
4% 3.33 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FASTDISK128GB 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0402B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 170 169 174 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.5% Good
Read 342
Write 166
Mixed 199
SusWrite 170
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 27.6
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 167
142% 210 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
365GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 90
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 37.2
108% 37.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO119E
Typical Aspire E1-772G Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback