| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
| System | Asus K52Jc (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K52Jc |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110125 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '23 at 16:47 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
38.9%
Below average
|
45% 76.4 Pts
|
20% 146 Pts
|
9% 147 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Asus(1043 1432) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201
|
1.26%
Terrible
|
1% 1.67 fps
|
2% 2.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 220 223 221 230 230 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
51% 228 MB/s
|
92% 30.6 MB/s
|
135% 180 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.9%
Poor
|
23% 8.03 GB/s
|
17% 5.97 GB/s
|
26% 152 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 21 | 17 | 60 | 15.5" | 1280 720 | SEC3046 |
Typical K52Jc Builds (Compare 145 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K52Jc
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples | 45x |
| Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples | 21x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 115x |
| GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $160 |