Amazon r6idn.16xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAmazon r6idn.16xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory493.5 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 951
84% 714 Pts
64-Core 4,613
286% 4,613 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 215GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 212 238 232 224 228 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 492
Write 228
Mixed 311
SusWrite 228
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 6.3
23% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 55%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 5.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 502 513 505 506 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.1% Excellent
Read 404
Write 549
Mixed 444
SusWrite 507
108% 476 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 19.3
63% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 428
341% 480 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2555 2347 2324 2324 2324 2325 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 10.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 222 241 238 228 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 550GB
196GB free
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 147 158 160 153 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
249% Outstanding
MC Read 102
MC Write 126
MC Mixed 89.3
302% 106 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 11
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 249%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback