MSI B360-A PRO (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360-A PRO (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 06:28
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 550
66% 508 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 550.09
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.8
81% 101 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 94.9
78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 234
Mixed 212
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 40.5
147% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 213
184% 275 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 29.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 28
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 14% 35 169 2 60 43.2" 1536 793 PHL08FA PHL BDM4350
Typical B360-A PRO (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 1,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI B360-A PRO (MS-7B22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback