Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 04:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 641
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 82.9
42% 64 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 136
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2308) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 2
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 57 101 78 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 210
Write 162
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 92.5
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 9.5
69% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 11.7
20% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
339GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 114 114 116 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 115
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 21 60 20" 1280 720 ACR00C7 V203H
Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback