PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X10DAi (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X10DAI |
Memory | 238.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160202 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '23 at 00:59 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 383 378 392 394 392 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
402GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 171 170 173 174 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 100 | 24.1" | 1280 720 | SAM100A LC27RG50 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 9x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $211 |