Micro UM480XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro UM480XT  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F6BFC
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 21:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 989
93% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 25.2
15% 20.6 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 20
Splatting 18.1
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESO512GTLCW-EP3-2L 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 308 314 316 315 314 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 1,476
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 486
256% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 65.6
214% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,253
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 997
735% 980 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 190%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 34.3
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 34.8" 1280 720 HKC0000 HKC TV
Typical UM480XT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Micro UM480XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback