Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 174 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 275 39% 285 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 138 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 6.3 3% 4.07 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.8 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 490 Write 427 Mixed 309 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 44.3 156% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 172 179% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 37.3 Write 4.7 Mixed 9.9 16% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.2 134% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.1% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.3 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 6.9 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	15	60	23.1"	1280 720	LEN0093 LEN-M93z-B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16