HP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 899C
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 18:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 305
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 495
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 899C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 18.4
12% 17.7 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 15.6
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEJN512GA87EC0 512GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE36P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 603 504 1224 1294 1301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 622
Write 741
Mixed 729
SusWrite 866
168% 739 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 34.2
116% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 295
210% 272 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 34.3
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1536 864 AUO439D
Typical 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 470 17 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback