MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 428%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics369% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive471% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 198
2-Core 393
122% 229 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,239
124% 1011 Pts
64-Core 1,786
111% 1,786 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,200
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
369% Outstanding
Lighting 585
Reflection 543
Parallax 668
477% 599 fps
MRender 504
Gravity 551
Splatting 298
354% 451 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 369%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2834 2945 3041 3163 3166 3160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 2,767
Write 3,214
Mixed 3,031
SusWrite 3,052
682% 3,016 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 92.4
337% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,747
DQ Write 1,413
DQ Mixed 1,579
1,182% 1,580 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 471%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2846 3067 2994 2922 2934 2928 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 2,796
Write 3,063
Mixed 2,897
SusWrite 2,949
661% 2,926 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 83.2
277% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,820
DQ Write 1,500
DQ Mixed 1,652
1,239% 1,657 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 451%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6000 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
201% Outstanding
MC Read 81.3
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 73.6
209% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 69.5
SC Write 59
SC Mixed 63.6
183% 64 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 201%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27" 1280 720 GBT2709 G27Q
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 411%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback