PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 15.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | MSI MS-7519 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080812 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 15 '23 at 13:46 |
Run Duration | 231 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.7%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 555
Nvidia(10DE 0958) 1GB
CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 957 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 7.1 12 11 13 25 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
7.72%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 3 | 60 | 34" | 1280 720 | AOC3402 Q34G2G5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples | 5x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 4x |
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $279 |