Intel NUC8i5BESB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i5BEHS
MotherboardIntel NUC8i5BESB  (all builds)
Memory33.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 13:22
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 427
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.8
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 286 294 182 30 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 656
Write 1,034
Mixed 365
SusWrite 214
128% 567 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 5.5
17% 6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 383
268% 338 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT32G4SFD8266.C16FF 39GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 30 36.1" 1280 720 FFA0000 43RP630K
Typical NUC8i5BESB Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i5BESB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback