Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170713
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '23 at 09:02
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Memory 14.9 1-Core 6 2-Core 34.9 10% 18.6 Pts	4-Core 69 8-Core 76.4 10% 72.7 Pts	64-Core 86 5% 86 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit L8T-128L6G-HP 128GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: D871701 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 85 100 127 120 109 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.1% Very poor	Read 119 Write 87.5 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 102 21% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 6.2 19% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 1x4GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 2.3 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 660 6% 660 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	15	5	60	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16